For AI automation agencies and implementation partners

Ship client agents without rebuilding context infrastructure

Skip building context ingestion, sync, retrieval, and access for every client. Set them up on their own Wire account and walk away clean when the work ends.

The infrastructure tax on every engagement

Where the margin actually goes

Every engagement starts at zero

Each new client means standing up ingestion, sync, retrieval, and access again. Weeks of plumbing before the agent does anything useful.

Bespoke pipelines per client

Different file types, different sources, different update cadences. The agent is the deliverable. The pipeline is the tax that keeps growing.

Handoff risk

When the engagement ends, the client inherits a custom stack only you understand. Maintenance becomes painful, renewals awkward.

Maintenance trails you forever

Each client's bespoke stack is yours to support. Wins on one project rarely transfer, and old work compounds into maintenance debt.

The substrate you stop rebuilding

Wire handles ingestion, sync, retrieval, and access. The same primitives that would otherwise eat the first three weeks of every engagement. Your team integrates the agent through MCP and a drop-in SDK connect flow. The same integration pattern runs against every container, no matter who owns it.

  • Build the agent integration once, reuse on every client
  • Predictable infra cost across engagements, not custom per-project plumbing
  • Standard MCP and REST surface every agent connects through
  • Onboard new engineers without ramping them on a bespoke RAG stack
  • Differentiate on the agent, not on the infrastructure

Three engagement shapes

Pick the one that fits the work.

Join the client's account

Your team joins the client's Wire account as admin, sets up a container for the agent use case, and builds against it. When the work ends, your team leaves the org. Best when the agent needs live connections to the client's own systems.

Build it, transfer it

Build a container in your own account, then transfer it to the client when it's ready. Data and structure move with the transfer. Best for delivered artifacts: web-scraped knowledge bases, curated content libraries, processed historical data.

Client handles it themselves

The client owns and operates their own container. Your team plugs an agent into it through MCP and walks away with the integration done. Best when the client wants to run the substrate independently.

Common questions

Who should own the Wire account?
It depends on the engagement. For ongoing work where the agent needs live connections to the client's systems, join the client's Wire account as an admin and build the container there. For delivered artifacts (web-scraped knowledge bases, curated content libraries, processed historical data), build in your own Wire account and transfer the container at the end. Either way, the data and structure end up with the client.
What actually transfers when I hand off a container?
The container's entries, structure, history, and any analysis Wire has done all move with the transfer. Live source connections (Drive, Notion, Slack) do not auto-transfer because they are tied to the account that authorized them. The client reauthorizes their own connections after the handoff. Plan for this by either using the client's own source accounts during the build, or by treating the container as a delivered artifact rather than a live sync target.
Can I work on multiple clients from one place?
Yes. As an admin in each client's Wire org, you can switch between them in the app. Your operational view stays unified even though each client owns their own infrastructure.
How do I price Wire into a client engagement?
Wire bills the client directly, so it does not show up on your invoice. Quote your build and ongoing work as you normally would. Brief the client on Wire's credit-based pricing during scoping so the operating cost is explicit.
Does the client have to learn Wire to use the agent?
No. The agent talks to the container through MCP. The client only touches Wire if they want to add context themselves, review what is in there, or manage access. For most engagements, the agent is the only surface they see day to day.

Learn more

Patterns and pitfalls when building agents on top of context.

Article

Why MCP failures are a context engineering problem

New research analyzed 3,282 MCP bug reports across GitHub. The patterns reveal a context delivery problem, not a protocol problem. Here's what it means.

Article

RAG Is Not Enough: When Retrieval Fails Your AI

RAG is a context-building strategy, not magic. Research shows 70% of retrieved passages miss the mark. Here's why naive retrieval fails and what works.

Article

One job per tool: why adding wire_navigate cut agent calls 24%

We restructured Wire's MCP surface from 2 overloaded tools to 3 single-purpose ones. The counterintuitive result: adding a tool cut total calls 24%.

Standardize your stack on Wire

Pick a client. Wire them in.

Try Wire on a Client